Subject	Not sure if you're right on the year >>
Posted by	sunrise089 on May 30, 2003 at 12:44 PM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	I keep with (and beat up on) my buddy regularly at stage 4 > posted by BigTDogg on May 30, 2003 at 09:23 AM
Message	The taillights changed from normal F-150 to cleared in 2001, thats inportant because 2001 lightnings also got a few performance mods that make them have 380hp, as oppossed to the 360hp 1999 and 2000s have. So if you're friend's doesnt have the cleared lights, he may have the somewhat slower model. The changes were basically intake, exhaust, and new rear end gears (something like going for 3.8X to 4.1X) which made the truck about another half second faster in the quarter.
Follow Ups	2002 Super charged Lightning vs Stage 3 300zxtt>> - BrianTT(TPA,FL) 07:27:54 05/30/03 Is the lightning stock? (n/m) - LRD VDR 07:40:25 05/30/03 Has pulley and supercharger. (n/m) - BrianTT(TPA,FL) 11:07:25 05/30/03 all new Lightnings have superchargers (n/m) - fourZero 11:16:45 05/30/03 What does he have done?, I raced one last summer - colocomp (CRUZ) 07:45:22 05/30/03 2nd. Look @ the coefficient of drag on that thing.. (n/m) - fourZero 10:48:13 05/30/03 Depends on what's done to it... >> - Greg (Dallas) 07:57:47 05/30/03 I whooped a stock one, but I'm higher than Stage III. (n/m) - MugenRacer 08:30:07 05/30/03 Re: 2002 Super charged Lightning vs Stage 3 300zxtt>> - Z-Freak 08:37:32 05/30/03 Last lighting I saw at the track was running 12.6 (n/m) - John@Z1 08:52:28 05/30/03 yup (n/m) - Tennyson (ATL) 09:15:30 05/30/03 I know a couple around here too. 12's all day. (n/m) - Arnel(Z32racing.com) 09:53:42 05/30/03 I keep with (and beat up on) my buddy regularly at stage 4 > - BigTDogg 09:23:08 05/30/03 Not sure if you're right on the year >> - sunrise089 12:44:17 05/30/03 Re: 2002 Super charged Lightning vs Stage 3 300zxtt>> - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 09:40:48 05/30/03 i have a vid of the run if anyone can host ~2.6MB (n/m) - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 12:36:24 05/30/03 I thought they run 13.7 stock and 5.2 to 60? - Naed 10:09:52 05/30/03 you're correct, but.... - sunrise089 12:41:06 05/30/03 Was it like this one !? >> - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 13:35:21 05/30/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.